Compare or Contrast two buildings Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Compare or Contrast two buildings - Essay Example B. Ariel Rios Federal Building’s sweeping facade. III. Subtle Artistic Design. A. U.S General Services Administration Building’s Indiana limestone facing. B. Ariel Rios Federal Building’s limestone clad. Outline Page Neo-Classical Architecture Thesis: U.S General Services Administration Building and Ariel Rios Federal Building showcase massive architecture, uncluttered appearance, and subtle artistic design comparing two samples of America’s Neo-Classical architecture. I. Massive Architecture defines U.S General Services Administration Building’s E-shaped configuration, and Ariel Rios Federal Building’s semicircular facade reflecting Neo-Classical architecture. A. U.S General Services Administration Building’s E-shaped configuration encompasses large courtyards promoting free airflow. B. Ariel Rios Federal Building’s Semi-circular facade entails monumental columns and dentils supporting the building. II. Uncluttered Appearance e laborates U.S General Services Administration Building’s organized flat and long facade and Ariel Rios Federal Building’s sweeping facade detailing the building’s commanding presence. A. ... A. U.S General Services Administration Building’s Indiana limestone facing covering the whole of the building’s exterior. B. Ariel Rios Federal Building’s limestone clad enables sculptures and carvings to be curved onto the exterior. Essay Neo-Classical Architecture Introduction Neo Classical architecture is an architectural style derived from classical Greece and Rome; though a common style in American Capitols, it derives from Andrea Palladio, an Italian architect. Neoclassical architecture focuses more on the walls than the sculptural volumes because it focuses more on having a commanding presence. Its planar features are usually autonomous and individually articulated features. Though some of these buildings are known to have domed roofs, not all of have this feature; some have flat and horizontal roofs. For example, U.S General Services Administration Building and Ariel Rios Federal Buildings showcase massive architecture, uncluttered appearance, and subtle artistic design comparing two samples of America’s Neo-Classical architecture. Massive Architecture defines U.S General Services Administration Building’s E-shaped configuration, and Ariel Rios Federal Building’s semicircular facade reflecting Neo-Classical architecture. For example, U.S General Services Administration Building’s E-shaped configuration encompasses large courtyards promoting free airflow. The E-shaped configuration allows for natural lighting because of the amount of glass covering the wall surface. The E-shaped configuration allows for cooling breezes in the offices because the open spaces allow for free flow of air in the courtyards. The natural lighting enters the building because the wall surface on the street

A. Critically assess why organisations should implement supportive Essay

A. Critically assess why organisations should implement supportive career management practices - Essay Example With more internal and external pressures to deliver client oriented services, professionals and organizations alike are increasingly pushed either to perform or face the axe of competitive market forces. Both the individual and the organization are all sailing in an expectant climate of taking responsibility for career management and development. Practitioners and researchers are in agreement that effective career management strategies are essential resources for organizational and individual growth prospects. Even though interest in the long-term growth may seem to be a shared objective of both individual employees and their employers, the key to a sustainable success remains the maintenance of sharp skills, which is largely the responsibility of the individual. The adage of ‘working for an employer for a lifetime with career prospects of â€Å"moving up the ladder†Ã¢â‚¬â„¢ seems to be a distant antique memory. In response to the new workplace dynamics, organizational management in the 21st century strives to reward quality services. In this regard, therefore, a working world characterized by globalized outsourcing, reorganization, contract labor, streamlining and downsizing has been adopted to curb escalating costs. As such, those entering the job market can, thus, be expected to have dynamic careers with the ability to serve clients in different organizations during a work life estimated to last for 40–50 years. ... While self-management is an important element of individual independence, it takes a self-activated attitudinal shift to cultivate reliance on oneself from the dictatorial organizational career management systems (Arnold, 1997). Critical self-analysis with a view to discovering inner, hidden talents, unexploited capabilities and career ambitions not only helps the individual to map out a concrete action plan but also creates the impetus towards the realization of one’s own desires (Sturges et al., 2000). Precisely, career self-assessment helps in developing more elaborate ideas on desired goals and how to achieve such aspirations. Contributing to the same subject of career development, Seibert, Kraimer and Crant (2001) are also in agreement that individual career self-management has an immense contributory effect on improving employee outcomes as well as the general success of one’s career. Accordingly, personal initiatives such as career oriented feedback from colleagu es provide a more satisfying level of carrier progress via identification of specific areas that require improvement. Notably, those active in monitoring and managing their career development are more likely to engage in informative career conversations to illuminate paths that better serve to accomplish personal aspirations (Schein, 1993). Indeed, self-assessment through feedback from colleagues informs a deeper understanding of oneself on certain fundamental internal career prospects which, in turn, enhance commitment to a more delivering career. Research into a more satisfying work life indicates that personal careers are most productive when employer’s goals are met (Sturges et al., 2000). Certainly, nothing would be more satisfying than knowing that preset targets