Case Study in Waste Management of Philippines Essay

Bart MeehanFacilities and service Di batch, The Australian subject area University, Canberra, Australia Keywords Australasia, Environmental focusing strategy, Universities Abstract Discusses the exdecadet to which environmental commission is considered a mainstream championship activity indoors Australian and clean Zealand universities. Describes how a muckle instrument was employ to collect info on environmental programs, their resourcing and control processes, and the take repoint of community interlocking in their training and ongoing forethought. These indicators of mainstreaming are discussed and particular quality is made to the Australian National University (ANU) and its draw with mainstreaming environmental vigilance. The survey data prognosticate that in the majority of the surveyed institutions, environmental way can non be considered a mainstream melodic line activity. To charge universities in assessing their progress towards mainstreaming, a abstra ct framework is presented and a model of organisational salmagundi is discussed.Introduction In chemical reaction to the c solos for ecologically sustainable study (WCED, 1987) and for leadership in environmental protection (Leal Filho et al., 1996), many universities throughout the world are recognising the need to withdraw environmental wariness systems and to integrate these systems into their business operations. However, in the USAand Europe, at least, some universities are vigorously pursuing park initiatives (Dahle and Neumayer, 2001). One reason for this may be that environmental watchfulness remains a peripheral counseling issue. This name suggests that if environmental programs are to succeed, they must be integrated into university operations, rather than sidelined as a softish management issue.Read more hook Management in the PhilippinesThis article provides an compend of environmental management in hug drug universities surveyed throughout Australia and New Zealand. while oftentimes instruction to the highest degree environmental management in both US (e.g. HammondCreighton, 1998 Herremans and all toldright, 2000), and European (e.g. Delakowitz and Hoffman, 2000 Noeke, 2000 Dahle and Neumayer, 2001) tertiary institutions has been forthcoming, aside from Howard et al.s (2000) shimmy study of the Charles Sturt University, little information about environmental management at Australian and New Zealand universities is available.Hopefully this contribution get out stimulate discussion and interest and throw out further empirical studies on environmental management in Australasian universities. The aim of this investigation is to identify the extent to which environmental management systems are underpinned by business management practice and thus integrated into university management processes. Herremans and Allright (2000) have suggested that the level of fiscal investment, and the level of senior executive inter-group commun ication indicate how mainstreamed environmental management programs are within tertiary institutions. While agreeing, we feel that in that respect are opposite indicators of mainstreaming that demonstrate organisational commitment. These include community involvement, the development of environmental visualises and the presence of control processes. This article examines features of each of the environmental programs surveyed, with particular furiousness on the followingThe presence of an environmental management plan and the level of financial and human resources available. .The control processes that exist (e.g. environmental management systems, audits, reports to management). . The level of campus community involvement in the program. After discussing the surveys, a abbreviated case study of the Australian National University (ANU) will be presented. This is included because of the authors familiarity with the issues and non because it necessarily offers an example of best practice. Indeed, if the analysis shows anything, it is that while much has been d genius to cleanse environmental performance at the surveyed universities, there is still much more to do. methodological analysis and survey results The authors developed a impartial survey instrument to gather information about the environmental management systems of Australasian universities.An invitation to complete the survey was issued to all universities in Australia and New Zealand via the Australian Universities Environmental Managers profit (AUEMN) and the mailing list of the Australasian high Education Facilities Managers Association (AAPPA). Of the 46 potential universities (38 Australian eight New Zealand), ten complete surveys were received a response rate of 21.7 per cent. The response rate for New Zealand universities (37.5 per cent) was much higher than that of Australian universities (18.4 per cent). The participate universities were . The University of Western Australia. . The University of Newcastle. . The University of New South Wales. . University of Wollongong. . over-embellished Melbourne Institute of Technology.The results of the surveys are shown in display panels I, II and III1. Table I shows base information about the environmental form _or_ system of government of the fighting(a) universities, including whether or not an environmental plan exists and thelevel of financial support. Table II contains information about community involvement. Table III contains details of control processes such as reporting and auditing. Not surprisingly, as indicated by Table I, the survey showed that all participating universities had an environmental insurance policy canonic at the executive level. All policies where conventional between 1994 and 1998. Either working groups or formal committees developed the majority of policies only two policies were established by employees without feedback from a working group or committee. All the policies established by the participating universities vex energy conservation, waste management and sustainability trace aims of the environmental program.Seven policies in any case get out broad references to the teach and research activities of the universities and the grandness of consistency between the principles espoused in teaching and the actions of the corporate university. Only mavin policy makes a specific reference to discolour the curriculum. Seven respondents indicated that an environmental management plan was developed following the blessing of a policy and that these plans are used to operationalise the principles detailed in the policy documents. Of the universities who did not have a formal plan, wiz stated that a plan was presently being developed, another that they work from the policy, and yet another that the university has an appropriate vision and objective which is driven by a well represented working society.One university without a plan also indicated that it was b ecoming increasingly recognised that mavin would be useful . . . to bring various programs unitedly and give them momentum. The survey asked respondents to comment on what, if any, management structure and compute had been established to facilitate the implementation of the environmental management program. Six universities stated that they had a formally established environmental management committee overseeing the implementation of the policy iv respondents indicated that there was no committee structure, with one of these respondents noting that the pre-existing management committee had ceased confluence in 1998 and has not reconvened. The surveys indicated that the facilities management division played a strong fictitious character in the implementation of environmental management objectives, in all but one of the participating universities.